Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
The link you provided is very interesting reading. Combined with source of your implementation it might even be ground breaking. Like Limbic~Region, I have not participated much in the previous few threads that you have started. However, the attitude and blatant disrespect for IT professionals, students, and others on this forum is inexcusable. I am enough of a cynic to ask someone to prove it when suggesting their solution is better than anything else out there. Hand waving does not count. Something reproducible, something that can be examined, something that can be tweaked and retested is necessary. That is how science works. You may be as brilliant as you say you are, and your framework may be the end of all other frameworks. Assuming that is the case, you are still going to need to prove that your system is one that should be used over other proven solutions. Many con men (I am not including you in this category) are also very talented individuals in their own right. That does not mean that I would trust anything that they say. Snake oil, phishing, and certified check scams should be enough to drive that point home. What individuals have asked for is the ability to verify your results. Nothing more. --MidLifeXis In reply to Re: I will be vindicated
by MidLifeXis
|
|