good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I accumulated over the last few years, but there is rhyme and reason to it all. I have the best of intentions here! Let me explain There is never cause for being rude , esp to those civil souls who were genuinely interested in hearing what you have to say (most of them) But those rules just don't apply anymore Sure they do, see Increasing the efficiency of a viral clonal expansion model And therein comes the reason why my ideas have received a less than lukewarm response. Like many have told you many times, this is not the reason. but that does not matter, because it is incredibly easy and quick to program in it, For you and only you , no one else, and only because you know it so well, not because of the syntax. Like I explained in Re^2: RFC : Abstraction Markup , TT2 does it with almost identical syntax/rules -- its prior-art In reply to Re: Moores Law, Perl and the future
by Anonymous Monk
|
|