Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
You just confirmed my argument... Except that I didn't. This is my suggestion, it can't possibly be your argument :) My suggestion does not compromise anonymity one iota A "username" is a name by definition, there can only be one here, it is a defacto perlmonks identity, whether or not its linked to any other identities (online or real world) Anonymous Monk is the equivalent of having no name Temporary in-thread-branding doesn't give you a name, doesn't link you to any identity, it merely hints at your location within a room --- anonymity intact In reply to Re^13: to distinguish between [Anonymous Monk]s in a thread, brand 'em
by Anonymous Monk
|
|