Wouldn't a full history be better because then it would provide the neccesary context? I'm concerned that this could be used in any legal sense anywhere. It would be like me printing out my online bank statment and using that as evidence. Anyone could save the source, edit it, and then load it up and print it. Is our legal system realy so stupid as to accept this as evidence?

Would you mind sharing what role CB conversations played in convicitng you? Or are you refering to conversations in some other medium?