Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Regrettable module names

by biosysadmin (Deacon)
on Jul 04, 2004 at 09:29 UTC ( [id://371692]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Regrettable module names
in thread Regrettable module names

I like this one. The only thing that I think you could possibly do better would be to imply the Protocol somehow and just name it Acme::Remote::Strangulation. Also, some code examples in the perldoc would be nice too. :)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Regrettable module names
by TStanley (Canon) on Jul 04, 2004 at 16:54 UTC
    Thank you for the suggestions :-) I will put them in my To-Do list for the module.

    TStanley
    --------
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing -- Edmund Burke
Re^3: Regrettable module names
by ChemBoy (Priest) on Jul 06, 2004 at 16:05 UTC

    Shouldn't it be Acme::Strangulation::Remote? Seems more in keeping with the general-to-specific idea of name spaces...



    If God had meant us to fly, he would *never* have given us the railroads.
        --Michael Flanders

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://371692]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-03-28 10:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found