http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=376553


in reply to When is => ne , (warning rather arcane and possibly totally useless)

I think part of the boggling has to do with the fact that 'strict' is a legal bareword if strictures are off. I had to think through that one when I looked at this one. (Nice conundrum, btw. ++!) You see "use strict" in some fashion and that bit is flipped in your head, regardless of the fact that the mess you're considering is the "use strict" declaration itself. So, I was applying strictures (specifically strict 'refs') without truly verifying that strictures were in force.

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose

I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested