![]() |
|
No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Khronoby diotalevi (Canon) |
on Aug 03, 2004 at 20:19 UTC ( #379813=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
As a general point of style, s/\s+//g is preferrable to s/\s//g because the output is the same but you allow \s+ to quickly advance the pointer while \s under /g has to use the pattern-scoped pointer advancement.
In Section
Obfuscated Code
|
|