Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re: Unexpected output from fork (Win32)

by tachyon (Chancellor)
on Aug 09, 2004 at 11:23 UTC ( #381194=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Unexpected output from fork (Win32)

Have a look at Re: Forking and writing to files for one way to parallel process lists with some file locking.



  • Comment on Re: Unexpected output from fork (Win32)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Unexpected output from fork (Win32)
by maa (Pilgrim) on Aug 09, 2004 at 12:00 UTC

    there's no 'problem' with the results I just found it odd that each thread had reportedly processed 256 consecutive items even though they weren't actually done consecutively.

    Sample output:

    10 threads started - waiting on completion.
    Computer000257 checked by -378
    Computer000513 checked by -380
    Computer000769 checked by -349
    Computer001025 checked by -366
    Computer001281 checked by -326
    Computer001537 checked by -305
    Computer001793 checked by -338
    Computer002049 checked by -360
    Computer002305 checked by -127
    Computer000002 checked by -373
    Computer000258 checked by -378
    Computer000514 checked by -380
    The input is sequential, Computer000000 - Computer10000. I just though it was 'wierd'.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://381194]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (2)
As of 2023-09-26 01:45 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found