Cool new use for Camel Book

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Cool new use for Camel Book by Nitrox (Chaplain) on Sep 24, 2004 at 17:34 UTC
Elliott(--) for not warning the link contains "non-workplace" content. -Nitrox	[reply]
Re^2: Cool new use for Camel Book by Elliott (Pilgrim) on Sep 24, 2004 at 17:38 UTC
OK - fair point - I guess we all have diferent kinds of workplace. I thought it was funny rather then offensive but everyone's different.	[reply]
Re: Cool new use for Camel Book by grantm (Parson) on Sep 25, 2004 at 01:26 UTC
Here's a slide from a recent talk that illustrates a more conventional use for Perl books (beware, toilet humour reference).	[reply]
Re: Cool new use for Camel Book by theorbtwo (Prior) on Sep 24, 2004 at 17:38 UTC
Actually, it's not purticularly new, and that's a purticularly bad copy of it -- it's been sized quite small, and has a rather big, obnixious logo in the corner. Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).	[reply]
Re: Cool new use for Camel Book by CountZero (Bishop) on Sep 24, 2004 at 21:11 UTC
Anybody knows how or why the Camel got involved? Surely there must be a story behind it? Anyone here well-versed in obscure Perl-lore? CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks