Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: OT choice for bug reporting systems

by sharkey (Scribe)
on Oct 07, 2004 at 19:56 UTC ( [id://397421]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: OT choice for bug reporting systems
in thread OT choice for bug reporting systems

I've used both systems, and you have some misinformation there.

Bugzilla does have a email interface. It needed some hand-tweaking when I set it up a year or two ago, so I cannot vouch for its condition, but it is there.

Bugzilla also has an interface for customization. You can have separate products (like "queues" in RT), and you can further break them down into components. So bugzilla is more flexible there.

Bugzilla allows you to set the default bug owner by product/component. We use a fake "bug" user, and assign someone to figure who should solve the bugs.

IMHO bugzilla is more user-friendly, and allows the user to customize their own stuff more, such as how their own list of bugs is displayed.

I have not setup RT, but I suspect is may be easier, precisely because there are less customizable options. RT also has some nice built-in knowledge-base functions.

  • Comment on Re^2: OT choice for bug reporting systems

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://397421]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 18:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found