|
in reply to Re^2: I prefer to wear...
in thread I prefer to wear...
Aren't trunks boxer briefs? I think someone must despair at you not knowing all the terminology for your preferred underwear.
Either that or it's just random voting.
I'm apalled that the trunks category wasn't split into trunks with a button fly, and trunks without. I have downvoted the whole world in protest. |
Re^4: I prefer to wear...
by monktim (Friar) on Oct 19, 2004 at 13:32 UTC
|
Are boxer briefs a subset of trunks? Hmm, the package (no pun intended) only had boxer briefs written on it.
I think we have a new holy war.
It must be time for a wardrobe change when your underwear
is voted worst node of the day. ROTFL!
| [reply] |
Re^4: I prefer to wear...
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 23, 2004 at 15:01 UTC
|
Since we're getting picky here, I'm surprised boxers (and other similar styles) are not categorized as "butt-crack seamed" and "butt-crack seamless". | [reply] |
|
