Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The Law of Inconsistent Assumptions

by eric256 (Parson)
on Oct 20, 2004 at 16:02 UTC ( [id://400906]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Law of Inconsistent Assumptions

In the subtle differences category I have a real life example of my own. Well I have many, but one happened the same day you posted this. It should be noted that chat and posts like this drasticaly increase the confusion because of the lack of non-verbal cues as to a words meaning.

My example happened in an IM session while helping a fellow programmer debug. At one point he said "i can't be bothered to fix that", which reading now doesn't sound offense, but at the time, in the context, it sounded to me like a great insult. I had spent my time helping him and then he suddenly can't be bothered. I see it as a good example of this law in work because even now I don't see the insult. Communication is such a treaky beast, in my head this seemed like a great post and now it has dwindled to nothing more than a rambling.

Just my 2 cents as usual.


___________
Eric Hodges
  • Comment on Re: The Law of Inconsistent Assumptions

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Emotionless Computers (was: Law of Inconsistent Assumptions)
by perlcapt (Pilgrim) on Oct 23, 2004 at 13:38 UTC
    As a social group, we (pronoun open to interpretation) may be finding certain comfort in knowing that the computers with which we communicate may misunderstand our meaning, but never misunderstand our feelings. Feelings are never a factor. This is a much simpler set of unknowns for communications than with humans, right Mr. Spock?

    Perhaps the computer's of lack emotional interpretation is why we spend so much time with them. But then, when we get into discussions with other humans concerning computers or using computers (and networks) we are surprised by the emotional reactions. People associated with computers are emotional!

    Going back to the original thread of this discussion: Thank goodness the article, The Law of Inconsistent Assumptions, reminds us that it is a predictable phenomenon. Look how long it took the Western world to codify the predictable phenomenon of gravity despite the fact that people had been falling down and hurting themselves for millenia. The "Active Listening" mentioned in Re: The Law of Inconsistent Assumptions is like having a pillow that makes the falls more comfortable and with less injury. Good Stuff.

    perlcapt
    -ben

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://400906]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 05:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found