Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
RE: RE: RE: RE: Of Dead Trees and Democracyby extremely (Priest) |
on Nov 11, 2000 at 08:24 UTC ( [id://41065]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Actually, the choice was between Congress (no check and
balance that way), Vote by State (Govenor or State House?
worse you have people who you may no longer like picking
higher ups, dangerous!), and Vote by Landholder (Populous
States could control the presidency even though most
States weren't represented at all.)
The compromise was to have States cast as many votes as they had seats in the combined houses, giving a slight proportional edge to small states and taking away the direct vote which could have overwhelming single candidate votes. The compromise of the Electoral College means you elect a group of people who promise to vote your way and tends to prevent a few states from dominating the country or a cult of personality in one region from overwhelming the popular vote. You must win a majority of the people in a majority of the states, even if only by the slightest margins. The hidden danger/benefit of the Electoral College is that in all but 2 States, they aren't REQUIRED to vote for the candidate they promised to vote for. The reasoning at the time was that men of conscience would be able to pick a new choice if the original choice died or proved to be a criminal or was shown to be lying about his campaign promises or was disqualified after the popular election but before assuming office. Thus, by placing the final power to select the President in the hands of these representatives we assure the smooth transition of power without having to involve the rather partisan and potentially in need of checks and balances House/Senate. The system just seems really interesting when one candidate wins a few large states and the other wins a lot of small states. Then a few medium sized states winds up picking. Or even just one. =) The nice thing about the Electoral College system is that it is only confused when the people are. The bad thing is that the ignorant masses that the founders feared almost as much as a Monarchy might keep getting confused and start believing we live in a Democracy rather than a Representative Republic. =P --
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|