in reply to •Re: Mysterious "syntax error"
in thread Mysterious "syntax error"

D'uh! I should've worked that out, but ... I didn't.

I've encountered it before. I may even have asked a SoPW on it a ways back. I'm pretty sure I've answered one or two about it, but I could *not* see the ambiguity. I guess that just shows how infrequently the guessing gets it wrong.


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"But you should never overestimate the ingenuity of the sceptics to come up with a counter-argument." -Myles Allen
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail        "Time is a poor substitute for thought"--theorbtwo         "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon