Re: Boolean algebra

I'd attempt this, but your specification is inconsistent, and as I was looking at it, I stopped working on it until you clarify. Specifically:

The order of variables in the output string had to be the same as the input string.

This specification cannot be used with your sample data because you have the items delivered in different orders in the subexpressions: (abdc) vs (adc-b). So are you saying:

that we're permitted to select a subexpression at random with which to comply, or
that your sample data would never be the actual data, or
that this rule can be tossed out?

(Each of those yields a slightly different solution in my mind, because I can optimize for some things differently in each. {grin})

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker

Comment on Re: Boolean algebra Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: Re: Boolean algebra by le (Friar) on Nov 13, 2000 at 18:41 UTC
Maybe I wasn't clear. The order of variables in the output string had to be the same as the input string. This means that `(abc)(b-ac)` [download] and `(cb-a)(bca)` [download] are equally correct input strings (they are even the same expression since (a AND b AND c) OR (b AND NOT a AND c) is the same as (c AND b AND NOT a) OR (b AND c AND a)). But the output of the first reduction would be `(bc)` [download] and of the second reduction `(cb)` [download] Of course there can be many negated variables like this: `(-a-b-c-d)(-c-da-b)` [download] which would result in `(-b-c-d)` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
RE: RE: Re: Boolean algebra by merlyn (Sage) on Nov 13, 2000 at 18:52 UTC
Why is the second one `(cb)` and not `(bc)`, since both orderings are in the input string? What permits me to pick one subexpression over the other? You still aren't clear, and the specification is still ambiguous to me. -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker	[reply]
RE: RE: RE: Re: Boolean algebra by le (Friar) on Nov 13, 2000 at 19:09 UTC
Sorry for being ambigous. Let's start over: The whole expression ((...)(...)) can be simplified if the two partial expressions (inside the braces) differ in just one negated variable. If the whole expression can be simplified, then the result is the first partial expression without the variable that differs. (So have to pick first partial expression.) That's why (in these two examples) one output is (cb) and the other one is (bc)	[reply]


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks