Re: Considering nodes for re-titling


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks

Re: Considering nodes for re-titling

by borisz (Canon)

on Jan 06, 2005 at 01:14 UTC ( [id://419784]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Considering nodes for re-titling

Since my english is somewhat bad, from time to time someone retitle my nodes. I noticed that the new title is in better english, but did not reflect my question anymore.

I suggest, that a retitled node must have the original title at the top of the question.

Boris

Comment on Re: Considering nodes for re-titling

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Considering nodes for re-titling by exussum0 (Vicar) on Jan 06, 2005 at 12:38 UTC
Agreed. This should satisfy the search mechanism's ability to find your original node. ---- Give me strength for today.. I will not talk it away.. Just for a moment.. It will burn through the clouds.. and shine down on me.	[reply]
Re^2: Considering nodes for re-titling by Joost (Canon) on Jan 06, 2005 at 18:40 UTC
I agree. Removing the old title doesn't really serve a purpose unless it's abusive. Using "New title (was: old title)" or "New title (renamed from: old title)" seems like a good idea to me. And the Janitors can mangle abusive titles if they need to - "Why use perl (Was: perl ****)". "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"*	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://419784]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others admiring the Monastery: (3)

As of 2024-04-19 19:54 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found