One of those is a suspect word, but i think the others are valid words and meet the spec?
8
dukes
house
krems
makes
pokes
smoke
spade
spoke
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
BrowserUk,
Sorry - see the 3rd assumption.
The number of letters in common is the exact number of unique letters in common. A 't' would only be counted once even if it existed twice in both the mystery word and the hint word
- dukes has 5 letters in common with dukes
- krems has 3 letters in common with seams
- makes has 3 letters in common with seams
- pokes has
35 letters in common with pokes
I didn't finish the list as you can see you have a flaw in your code (which I am interested in seeing).
| [reply] |
... you have a flaw in your code ...
Not really. It's doing exactly what I thought the challenge required.
Then I strongly suggest that you completely re-word the text of your challenge. Something along the lines of:
The mystery word has exactly 2 unique letters in common with 'bumps'
As the rules stand, with the details spread all over the place like that, it is very misinterpretable.
As for my "code", it was originally a hand-coded single regex applied to all the 5 characters words in my words file.
I had just finished writing a script to generate the regex from command line input of the form:
P:\test>421692-1 5 bumps:2 seams:2 domes:3 shake:3 pokes:3 dukes:3
8
dukes
house
krems
makes
pokes
smoke
spade
spoke
When I read your reply that I was misinterpreting your spec. I'll have to take a look and see if it is adaptable to my new understanding of the rules.
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
| [reply]
[d/l] |
