in reply to Bit operations for beginners

You have defined XOR as

Shouldn't XOR be defined as

`(a&b) | (~a&~b)`, surely this is the inverse of XOR ( the biconditional).Shouldn't XOR be defined as

`(a&~b) | (~a&b)`?
In Section
Meditations

Re: Bit operations for beginners

by Feb 04, 2005 at 17:37 UTC (replies)

on
http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=428141

in reply to Bit operations for beginners

You have defined XOR as `(a&b) | (~a&~b)` , surely this is the inverse of XOR ( the biconditional).

Shouldn't XOR be defined as` (a&~b) | (~a&b)`?

Shouldn't XOR be defined as

In Section
Meditations