Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: Appealing a consideration?by grinder (Bishop) |
on Feb 22, 2005 at 19:26 UTC ( [id://433466]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Retitling is a community process, people vote on the consideration. Yes, but sometimes the community's decisions suck. There have been a few retitling considerations over the last few months that I consider pretty frivolous, despite there having been two calls for a more reasoned approach. I would like especially to draw attention to borisz's observation: I noticed that the new title is in better english, but did not reflect my question anymore. That's just wrong. And a janitor may well message you, but what if you are in a different time zone (and thus, asleep), or offline for a day or two? I think sleepingsquirrel has every right to change the title back. And I suspect that the janitors simply won't bother the second time around. Besides, once the node is off the radar in a few days, the probability of it being further considered rapidly approaches zero. update: s/dopey/frivolous/ The latter word expresses my opinion on the matter more accurately. - another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|