Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Trained Perl professional or self-taught hack?

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
on Apr 01, 2005 at 21:25 UTC ( [id://444292]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Trained Perl professional or self-taught hack?

I think that in programing, like most other fields of endeavour, there are four main traits:

  1. Those who treat it as work--a means to an end.

    Always employed, rarely inspired.

  2. Those who treat it as an artform--an end in itself.

    Often inspired, often unemployed.

  3. Those who treat it as a subject, often one of many, to be explored, expanded upon and shared.

    Often employed doing something else, or employing others. Always inspiring.

  4. Those who use their knowledge as a cudgle with which to beat others over the head.

    Usually employed. Never inspired. Never inspiring.

Most people are a little of all of them. The critical factor is the mix.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco.
Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
  • Comment on Re: Trained Perl professional or self-taught hack?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Trained Perl professional or self-taught hack?
by cazz (Pilgrim) on Apr 01, 2005 at 21:29 UTC
    Very well said. There are other factors too, like laziness and hubris. A little of both are required to be a "good" programmer. (But only a little...)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://444292]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (1)
As of 2024-04-24 13:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found