Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

What's the difference? And would you suggest I use a different term in the module name even though "tag" is the popular term?

Comment on Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 22, 2005 at 17:08 UTC
It's not so much that there's a difference, but rather, that people should use different terms for different things, and should continue to use a single well established term for a single thing. I think you should consider using the term "keywords" unless it will seriously hinder comprehension and adoption by your target audience.	[reply]
Re^4: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags by DrHyde (Prior) on Jun 23, 2005 at 09:05 UTC
If using the word "keywords" will confuse the target audience, then the target audience is far too stupid for you to want to target them with anything less than the Black Death.	[reply]