Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: It's not human!

by Blue (Hermit)
on Dec 19, 2000 at 21:28 UTC ( #47423=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: It's not human!
in thread It's not human!

I have visions of an animated paperclip that can search with all of the power of supersearch and all of the user friendliness of supersearch...hey wait, why not just use supersearch?

A bot which just gives the same info as a search doesn't seem all that useful, and would clutter up the chatterbox. If the intent was that the groups of new monks that are not likely to read faqs or search for answers would have another place to spit them to already written responses ... I feel something is missing.

I'm not against a bot as such. I wonder about the usefulness of the bot. I wonder about people worried that their CB words will be logged by the bot. It just seems that it doesn't bring enough to the monestary.

=Blue
...you might be eaten by a grue...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: It's not human!
by Petruchio (Vicar) on Dec 19, 2000 at 22:13 UTC
    People might indeed worry about having what they say in the CB logged. That, in my opinion, is a good thing. The fact is, what you say in the Chatterbox might be logged even now; you don't know. If the presence of a bot served to remind you of this, that'd be a good thing in my book.

    Naturally, a bot should not be a means of poorly replicating existing services. I do think that there's considerable opportunity to make this a unique resource. Since the presence of a bot would not entail altering the Monastery itself in any way, we'd have plenty of latitude to discover good uses for it empirically, without screwing anything up.

Re: Re: Re: It's not human!
by mirod (Canon) on Dec 19, 2000 at 21:51 UTC

    In order not to clutter the CB it would be easy to have the bot /msg the monk instead of broadcasting the message for all to see.

      That would seem to add without cluttering up discussions in the CB, which would definitely be prefered. I'd liek some switch about whether you're interested in what the 'bot would say - if I'm giving answers or links, it may not interest me for what the bot is suggesting.

      As an additional point, we would still have to deal with concerns about logging conversations.

      I'm fine with bots in general, I just don't want it to turn negative. /msg is a good start.

      =Blue
      ...you might be eaten by a grue...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://47423]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2023-02-01 13:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:







    Results (3 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?