Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: CGI::Application for complex web applications?

by esskar (Deacon)
on Jul 28, 2005 at 00:45 UTC ( #478776=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to CGI::Application for complex web applications?

Well, i was in a similar situation. I implemented a POP3/SMTP based WebMailer without using any framework (like CGI::Application(::Plus)). Everything was working but unclean. A year later i thought about including IMAP and NNTP as well. But i knew that my kernel was to unstructered, so i looked throught cpan and found CGI::Application(::Plus). I tried it and started reimplementing my webmailer. But i didn't like the fact, that i had to do the dispatching stuff (as you mentioned). Now I use Catalyst (The Elegant MVC Web Application Framework :) ) which is really powerful and easy to use (thanks sri). Have a look at it.
Now I'm happy.
  • Comment on Re: CGI::Application for complex web applications?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: CGI::Application for complex web applications?
by cees (Curate) on Jul 28, 2005 at 01:47 UTC

    CGI::Application::Plus should not be used. The author has depricated the module, and changed the name to CGI::Builder, so if you really want to, use that instead. However, make sure you read up on the author before using those packages...

      Yes I'm aware that CGI::App::Plus is deprecated but CGI::Application itself isn't.

      I was thinking of CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode so that I wouldn't need to write setup and add run modes by hand ...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://478776]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2023-02-01 15:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:







    Results (10 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?