Re: Pack function

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Pack function by vrajan (Novice) on Aug 02, 2005 at 07:55 UTC
With "n" i get 1000000000000000 in one binary and 1010010000000000 in the other. With "N" i get 00000000000000001010010000000000 with both binaries.	[reply]
Re^3: Pack function by esskar (Deacon) on Aug 02, 2005 at 09:42 UTC
perldoc -f pack says: n An unsigned short in "network" (big-endian) order. N An unsigned long in "network" (big-endian) order. IMHO it can't be endian problem!?!	[reply]
Re^3: Pack function by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 02, 2005 at 09:04 UTC
One is running on a little-endian machine and the other on a big-endian? Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The "good enough" maybe good enough for the now, and perfection maybe unobtainable, but that should not preclude us from striving for perfection, when time, circumstance or desire allow.	[reply]
Re^4: Pack function by vrajan (Novice) on Aug 02, 2005 at 09:44 UTC
I am running the code on the same machine.	[reply]
Re^5: Pack function by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 02, 2005 at 09:57 UTC
Re^6: Pack function by Anonymous Monk on Aug 02, 2005 at 11:41 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks