Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: OT: Re-use system signals or create userland ones

by talexb (Chancellor)
on Aug 16, 2005 at 15:16 UTC ( [id://484168]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: OT: Re-use system signals or create userland ones
in thread OT: Re-use system signals or create userland ones

    I suggest sockets, unix-domain sockets, semaphores,or pipes as more suitable mechanisms to be considered.

Well, this takes me back to the debate between polling and interrupt driven I/O.

If it's a socket, semaphore or pipe, I have to poll it (I believe), whereas with a signal, I get interrupted. I haven't described my system in great detail, but essentially it's a web application with two daemons taking care of 'processing and moving stuff around' by checking the database, doing stuff (if necessary), then sleeping for 10-15 seconds. I'd like to be able to prod the two daemons to produce reports on what their queue situation is (from the web application), and then display the results on a web page.

With a signal, the daemons will do the report right away, while using a socket will cause the daemons to do the report the next time they go through their loop.

And if my use of SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 provokes a collision with other services, I may have to go to a socket after all .. it's just not my preferred solution.

Alex / talexb / Toronto

"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://484168]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-19 19:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found