Re^3: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files?

The more general point I was making was that when making a module to help with testing some other module or application, creating it with a whole distribution skeleton (README, MANIFEST, Changes, etc.) is unnecessary, whether using Module::Starter, Extutils::ModuleMaker or h2xs or something else entirely. It's sufficient to just create a .pm file and stick it in t/ directory.

(N.B I'm the author of ExtUtils::ModuleMaker::TT, so, yes, I'm a fan of the ExtUtils::ModuleMaker school. And kudos to jkeenan1 for his recent updates!)

-xdg

Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.

Comment on Re^3: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? by geektron (Curate) on Sep 08, 2005 at 18:26 UTC
(N.B I'm the author of ExtUtils::ModuleMaker::TT, so, yes, I'm a fan of the ExtUtils::ModuleMaker school. And kudos to jkeenan1 for his recent updates!) heheheh. i've jumped on the testing team for ExtUtils::ModuleMaker, because i'd like to participate more, plus there are a few enhancements i'd like to see. the only reason i made my comment was that even if it can be considered "overkill" to use ExtUtils::ModuleMaker just to start testing, having that skeleton there helps one remember what's needed.	[reply]
Re^5: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? by ghenry (Vicar) on Sep 09, 2005 at 17:32 UTC
I'd like to see the addition of pod-coverage.t and pod.t like in Module::Starter Walking the road to enlightenment... I found a penguin and a camel on the way..... Fancy a yourname@perl.me.uk? Just ask!!!	[reply]
Re^6: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? by xdg (Monsignor) on Sep 09, 2005 at 20:04 UTC
Why? To more easily jack up a CPANTS Kwalitee score? That's a flame/religious war just waiting to happen, with plenty of people on both sides. ExtUtils::ModuleMaker is not Module::Starter. If you really want what Module::Starter gives, then use Module::Starter. -xdg Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.	[reply]
Re^7: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? by ghenry (Vicar) on Sep 09, 2005 at 22:22 UTC


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks