good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplitby jeroenes (Priest) |
on Jan 02, 2001 at 18:31 UTC ( [id://49293]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
After some CB discussion, tilly convinced me why the open was not such
good magic. So I devoted a separate routine to that. The filehandle still
is in the normal supersplit routine. I personally vote for the split order of arguments, because people are more familiar with that. I think the variable length list can be coped with by the pop's. If that's unusual, so be it. I know that this order is mostly not a good idea. Moreover, you can provide a limit option now. Because there is some magic involved, I doubled a function that doesn't try to find a limit parameter at the end. The code has been posted more than enough now, so I hooked it up to my homenode. POD has been updated. Code has been tested. Cheers, Jeroen
In Section
Craft
|
|