Re: RFC Is this readable?


Welcome to the Monastery
	PerlMonks

Re: RFC Is this readable?

by zentara (Archbishop)

on Oct 16, 2005 at 13:13 UTC ( [id://500557]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to RFC Is this readable?

Well, I think it is pretty good from a technical writing viewpoint. The English syntax is good; that is you convey your idea smoothly, without me having to reread something twice. And the punctuation looks good. So yes, it is readable.

I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. flash japh

Comment on Re: RFC Is this readable?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC Is this readable? by BerntB (Deacon) on Oct 16, 2005 at 13:22 UTC
Oh, ok. Is it understandable, too? :-)	[reply]
Re^3: RFC Is this readable? by zentara (Archbishop) on Oct 16, 2005 at 13:24 UTC
I'm not the best to answer that. Other monks are better at classes, and I don't quite understand what problem you are trying to solve? I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. flash japh	[reply]
Re^4: RFC Is this readable? by BerntB (Deacon) on Oct 16, 2005 at 13:26 UTC
Ah, not understandable. (See the introduction, referenced at the top for what it is.)	[reply]

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://500557]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others studying the Monastery: (3)

As of 2024-04-20 01:13 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found