The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Consider this: What makes a good node title?by rir (Vicar) |
on Nov 04, 2005 at 20:38 UTC ( [id://505867]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
sauoq I find your logic impeccable yet unconvincing.
This is a problem which extends beyond logic. Your arguments can be logically overturned, I don't see any value in doing
that since it doesn't address the real and valid concern you
are attempting to put forward.
Rather I suggest that Perlmonks is popular and well regarded because of its culture. I say this culture has two core characteristics:
Correctness leads us to not have P3r1munks painted on our gate. That same desire has us retitling nodes. This thread is inspired by a marginal case: the node could reasonably stand with its title. That said, I much prefer that the title was changed. I feel the "broken window syndrome" is germaine. I am repeatedly impressed by the timeliness of our editors and considerers. I think the speed with which these functions are executed is important. When a janitor sees a mess and quickly moves to clean it up I find myself reluctant to criticize: It's too clean.
Be well,
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|