Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Puzzle: The Ham Cheese Sandwich cut.

by Roy Johnson (Monsignor)
on Nov 21, 2005 at 19:31 UTC ( [id://510537]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Puzzle: The Ham Cheese Sandwich cut.
in thread Puzzle: The Ham Cheese Sandwich cut.

It isn't the goto that saves the copying. It's the use of & without parentheses to call the function. As far as I can tell, the goto is a useless relic.

Update: Ok, not entirely useless: if you want a routine not to return to where you called it from, goto is the way to do it. In other words, use it when you want to do weird control flow (which is what goto is all about). Example:

sub one { print "In one\n"; goto &two; print "never print this if you goto\n"; } sub two { print "In two\n"; } one();
It's like exec for the subroutine domain.

Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Puzzle: The Ham Cheese Sandwich cut.
by robin (Chaplain) on Nov 21, 2005 at 19:39 UTC
    In fact I'm wrong in any case. A naive recursive call seems to be just a hair faster than the goto, even when finding the median of a million-element list.

    As you suggest, the fastest of all is to simply call the sub with an ampersand, but really the difference is very small. I wonder whether this is running into unshift's worst-case performance.

    Premature optimization and all that…

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://510537]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-19 12:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found