Re: Re: Unicode in almost any Browser?!?

I thinq I did it that way because I wanted the form to accept "0" for the border width && cell padding but not for any of the other fields. If the form is submitted with a "0" in the fields seeded w/ "|| xxxx", it'll get the default value but I used the "unless defined" construct in order to avoid overriding a valid "0" value from the form. I'm sure I'm describing this way too verbosely here. I hope it makes sense.

There's surely a better way I'm not aware of to handle these conditions in the code too. I really should've used the "here document" method for printing all that stuff to. Thanks for the suggestion OeufMayo! I'll try to remember that next time =). Shalom.

-PipTigger

Comment on Re: Re: Unicode in almost any Browser?!?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Unicode in almost any Browser?!? by beppu (Hermit) on Jan 20, 2001 at 03:26 UTC
I'll try to remember that next time =). yeah, right. ;-)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Unicode in almost any Browser?!? by PipTigger (Hermit) on Jan 21, 2001 at 15:56 UTC
Hey you skeptic! Look at my code from a few months ago. Who would've thought I'd actually start using "#!perl -w" && "use strict;" but it happened. I'll use a here document in the future too. I'm not opposed to doing things in a new way if I lern that it's better than what I have been doing. In fact I didn't normally use the qq() function either... I used to escape all my double quotes. So I am adopting new habits. I am constantly trying to become a more efficient && elegant Perl hacker... a more practiced Monk if you will. I'm all defensive about it because I care what you thinq! You're just trolling me aren't you!?! Punko! I'll get you back! ;-) TTFN. -PipTigger p.s. Initiate Nail Removal Immediately!	[reply]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks