Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: The worst case scenario

by samizdat (Vicar)
on May 17, 2006 at 19:36 UTC ( [id://550066]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: The worst case scenario
in thread The worst case scenario

I had heard that, too, but the last word I'd heard (again, a while back) was that Management (!) was insistent upon eliminating BSD, no matter how many (hundreds of) boxen they had to add.

<SHAMELESS PLUG>

Here, our whole division's DNS and routing trees, and quite a few of our heavy load servers, are now happily FreeBSD. Every time the NT-oriented senior folks have a "moment", they task a junior admin with the problem and he solves it with FreeBSD. Our CAD systems admin would love to replace the RHL-E3 boxen that are used for EDA chip-simulation runs with FreeBSD, but he keeps running into places where the apps are Linux-specific, such as expecting a non-standard xterm. For the tools for which they do work, they're both faster and much more load-tolerant than the RH machines.

</SHAMELESS PLUG>

We SHALL overcome! :D

Don Wilde
"There's more than one level to any answer."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: The worst case scenario
by BerntB (Deacon) on May 20, 2006 at 23:30 UTC
    Oh, OK.

    I shall, at long last, d/l and try it. Have been thinking about it for years and now I have free disk.

    (Last BSD for me, was SunOS, pre Solaris 2... :-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://550066]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-19 08:59 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found