|
|
|
| There's more than one way to do things | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: The Ackermann Functionby gjb (Vicar) |
| on Jun 20, 2006 at 19:26 UTC ( [id://556515]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
I'm afraid this doesn't make sense to me. Are you suggesting that the Ackermann function should simply not be computed if the conditions for branch 3 hold? That would imply that one can only compute A(0, i) and A(i, 0), which is not particularly interesting. I may miss your point, but I'd be a bit surprised if FSMs would be useful in this context. Can you show us what you have in mind? Just my 2 cents, -gjb-
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||