Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks

Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

by planetscape (Chancellor)

on Oct 07, 2006 at 04:38 UTC ( [id://576795]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
in thread How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

Technically, one cannot approve or front-page one's own nodes. However, if one is working in concert with another, it's obviously possible to see how one account can approve, front-page, upvote another, etc. Approval can be withdrawn by janitors, though, and anyone who suspects behaviour as outlined above is advised to give the gods and/or janitors a heads-up. (janitors as a user-group can be messaged the same way you'd message another Monk.)

planetscape

Comment on Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
by grep (Monsignor) on Oct 07, 2006 at 06:03 UTC

example

one

the other

grep

One dead unjugged rabbit fish later

[reply]

Re^5: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

by GrandFather (Saint) on Oct 07, 2006 at 06:10 UTC

There are many actually. Also interesting is the preponderance of root nodes madtoperl posted. Most monks who have been around for a while have contributed many more replies than they have root nodes.

DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion