Re^2: Recommended PDL References

itub

Thank you very much for the reference. I already added it to my post. By the way, I noticed that most of the PDL documentation was written between the years 2000 and 2001. Do you have any idea why is that?

Cheers,

lin0

Comment on Re^2: Recommended PDL References

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Recommended PDL References by j3 (Friar) on Nov 23, 2006 at 23:55 UTC
By the way, I noticed that most of the PDL documentation was written between the years 2000 and 2001. Do you have any idea why is that? Just guessing, but my hunch is that large portions of the whole Perl community are collectively holding their breath for Perl6. This could be taken as a good sign, suggesting that folks plan on porting their modules/toolkits/frameworks to Perl6 at some point.	[reply]


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks