After considering DBIx::Class, Rose::DB was recommended to me. One thing I can't figure out is why there is the requirement that tables have a primary key. I'm working with a legacy DB in which many tables do not have a primary key. Is Rose::DB simply unusable? Or is there a workaround I haven't found yet? | [reply] |
In RDBO, each object represents a single, uniquely identified row in a table. Therefore, there must be some way to uniquely identify a row in a table. Any unique key will do, even if it's not specified as a primary key constraint in the database. But RDBO will need something that it calls a primary key. You can pick one of the unique keys and tell RDBO that it is the primary key, for example.
(You can actually create RDBO-derived classes that front tables without unique or primary keys, but the load() and save() object methods will not work as designed, for what I hope are obvious reasons.)
| [reply] |
Can Rose::DB use a primary key that spans multiple columns?
Also, does anyone know if of a support matrix comparing
supported features of roseDB with DBIC and CDBI?
| [reply] |
