Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Perl Golf Ethics

by polettix (Vicar)
on Jan 30, 2007 at 23:58 UTC ( [id://597470]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Perl Golf Ethics
in thread Perl Golf Ethics

I remember a University colleague cheating with an assignment in AI - he had to build an alpha-beta pruning based opponent in connect4. He lingered until the very end, and then resorted to the Internet (and 10 years ago I don't remember Google :). He later commented: "0 in AI... but 10 in websurfing!".

It's interesting that you cite the chess game. There are a lot of books on chess, and many openings have been studied and are learnt by a lot of people. What would you think about someone reviewing his chess book while doing an online (e.g. play-by-mail) match? I'm not sure I'd reduce it all to "take it only from your memory", even if I've to admit that I don't really know where to draw the line.

Flavio
perl -ple'$_=reverse' <<<ti.xittelop@oivalf

Don't fool yourself.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl Golf Ethics
by rinceWind (Monsignor) on Jan 31, 2007 at 11:07 UTC

    With online chess, the rules are usually given on the site. For non real time chess, such as correspondence chess (e.g. http://www.redhotpawn.com) consulting opening books or chess opening websites is allowed, but feeding your moves or position to a chess program is not allowed, though they can't stop you, and it's difficult to prove it.

    The site I mentioned has forums where this subject has been discussed in great depth.

    --

    Oh Lord, won’t you burn me a Knoppix CD ?
    My friends all rate Windows, I must disagree.
    Your powers of persuasion will set them all free,
    So oh Lord, won’t you burn me a Knoppix CD ?
    (Missquoting Janis Joplin)

      It's interesting how mtve's book can be considered a "classic" for Perl golf (and thus could be considered "allowed"), while Thospel's procedure to find his beautiful "magic formula" has been automatically executed by a computer according to this (which would break chess' rules of "no automation"). But, of course, the geniality resides in thinking that such a formula exists, not in the raw calculations! :)

      Flavio
      perl -ple'$_=reverse' <<<ti.xittelop@oivalf

      Don't fool yourself.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://597470]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2024-03-29 21:30 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found