|
|
|
| Welcome to the Monastery | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: Why Reaped???by ysth (Canon) |
| on Feb 19, 2007 at 04:27 UTC ( [id://600782]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
BTW: although I concur with ysth's opinion that the node should not have been reaped due to its nature, but after having read it now I also wholeheartedly agree with ikegami's opinion that it is horrendously, blatantly OT.I didn't say it shouldn't be reaped—I said we don't reap things for being OT. If someone felt it was a blatant troll, it should have been considered for reaping on that account. I'm looking for a job.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||