|
|
|
| No such thing as a small change | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Is Programming Perl still relevant as a reference book?by ysth (Canon) |
| on Mar 02, 2007 at 18:43 UTC ( [id://602929]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
My question is now, is The Camel Book still relevant as a reference book? The third edition is soon seven years old, and Perl is a moving target. Which version of the language does it refer to? What has changed? How will I know which parts have?Yes. 5.6. See perl58delta, perl581delta, perl582delta, ... perl588delta. I'm looking for a job.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||