Think about Loose Coupling | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: When 100% Code Coverage Backfiresby adrianh (Chancellor) |
on Mar 26, 2007 at 14:26 UTC ( [id://606585]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Isn't the point of coverage to change your tests to increase coverage? Nope. The point is to produce a better product. Sometimes that'll be by spotting where you need more tests. Sometimes that'll be spotting where you have dead code, or illogical code, and fixing that. Sometimes that'll be leaving well alone. (spot the bloke on a hobby horse - sorry :-)
In Section
Meditations
|
|