Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Something better than Inline::Java

by mpeters (Chaplain)
on May 01, 2007 at 01:18 UTC ( [id://612899] : note . print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Something better than Inline::Java

How are you using Inline::Java? Client/Server ? JNI? Shared JVM? Are you using it from a standalone Perl script? CGI script? mod_perl handler?

All of these things affect the way it will interact. I've found JNI to usually be the fastest, but it's a little tricky to get right under mod_perl.

Have you tried asking your question on the inline mailing list where the real gurus of Inline::Java hang out?

-- More people are killed every year by pigs than by sharks, which shows you how good we are at evaluating risk. -- Bruce Schneier

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Something better than Inline::Java
by suaveant (Parson) on May 01, 2007 at 14:23 UTC
    OOOh... JNI gives me a 20 percent speedup, thanks!

    It will most likely be used as a standalone script to generate product files, so it should be fine.

    I had sent a message to the list but it didn't seem to go through (maybe I sent it too soon after subscribe), I will have to try again. Thanks.

                    - Ant
                    - Some of my best work - (1 2 3)