|
|
|
| Keep It Simple, Stupid | |
| PerlMonks |
Re (tilly) 3: Perl is psychic?!by tilly (Archbishop) |
| on Mar 06, 2001 at 06:50 UTC ( [id://62421]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Whoever voted down the above node completely missed the
point. MrNobo1024 is completely correct in saying that
if Perl worked as documented as far back as, say, Camel 2
then it should not have had enough information to
calculate $&.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||