Re^5: 'base' versus @ISA, why?


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks

Re^5: 'base' versus @ISA, why?

by perrin (Chancellor)

on Jul 23, 2007 at 20:30 UTC ( #628324=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: 'base' versus @ISA, why?
in thread 'base' versus @ISA, why?

Hmm, none of my classes have $VERSION declarations, and base has never given me any trouble about it.

Comment on Re^5: 'base' versus @ISA, why?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: 'base' versus @ISA, why?
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Jul 24, 2007 at 11:53 UTC

Hmm, none of my classes have $VERSION declarations, and base has never given me any trouble about it.

Me neither.

The current (5.8.8) use base requires the file (and ignores any not-found exceptions) if there isn't already a $VERSION for the package containing a scalar. So I guess if you have something that sets $VERSION in another package you will get problems - but that seems am odd edge case to me.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom