laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: what would you like to see in perl5.12? (attributes)by TimToady (Parson) |
on Aug 21, 2007 at 17:39 UTC ( [id://634148]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I still believe there's a lot of potential in attributes, if only implemented properly.First have a look at how properties and traits are completely unified with object attributes and roles/mixins in Perl 6, which pretty much covers all of your points without thinking of attributes as a separate facility. I have this crazy notion that "implemented properly" must be preceded by "designed properly", you see... :-)
In Section
Meditations
|
|