Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: eval "require $class" seems wrong

by ikegami (Patriarch)
on Aug 22, 2007 at 19:08 UTC ( [id://634481]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: eval "require $class" seems wrong
in thread eval "require $class" seems wrong

I was kinda suggesting the best practice was to avoid requireing dynamic class names completely, and address the problem at a higher level.

To answer your question directly, one can require either a class supplied as a bareword or a path. There isn't a way to require a class supplied in a scalar. In order to load a dynamically constructed class name, some use eval EXPR to do the former (e.g. Module::Pluggable), and some transform the class name into a path and use the latter (e.g. if). I have no idea why one cannot do require $class;.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: eval "require $class" seems wrong
by sgt (Deacon) on Aug 22, 2007 at 20:02 UTC

    The second paragraph summarizes nicely the whole thread, but I cannot agree with the best practice you are suggesting which is don't use it IIUC.

    eval-require is a common idiom for conditional loading of modules and there is a need for that. From a language perspective a special "use" would be better like 'use any LIST' as the intent would be much clearer. Still you don't want "use base/use parent" wars^Wdiscussions for something simply expressed in an idiomatic but inelegant way. In the end I think low-level things like these should be made core pragmas and (possibly) written in C, thriving for a minimalistic implementation.

    cheers --stephan

      eval-require is a common idiom for conditional loading of modules and there is a need for that.

      No, you don't need either eval functions to conditionally load a module.

      if (condition) { require Foo::Bar; }

      And you don't need eval EXPR* to do exception handling.

      eval { require Foo::Bar; }; if ($@) { require Foo::Baz; }

      You only need eval EXPR to load a module whose name is not known at compile-time. The only things I can think of that fits that description are plugins/drivers, things well served by high-level modules.

      Do you have an example that requires require $class other than plugins/drivers?

      * — Remember, nothing wrong with eval BLOCK (called try in some other languages). Unlike eval EXPR, it doesn't invoke the Perl compiler. That means it doesn't incure a huge speed penalty and it doesn't require careful escaping and validation its argument.

        My question was exactly about plugins/drivers, i.e. I'm working on a code base that does dynamic loading of plugins, and find my self having to write eval "require $class" because of that. I can't really think of many other cases either (perhaps a factory?).

        still if you need a loop to pick up the first module to load of a list of modules (e.g say Math::Pari, GMP and other math libs). I am lazy and I don't want to write a require line for each one, or maybe I want to read my optional modules directly from the .yml shipped with the module etc...

        cheers --stephan

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://634481]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-24 07:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found