Re: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks

Re: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?

by merlyn (Sage)

on Oct 03, 2007 at 11:12 UTC ( [id://642378]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?

By Perl's definition I hope you're not talking about the rather pointless "Practical Extraction and Report Language", because that's an empty historical retro-fact. As in, it doesn't do anything to describe modern Perl, nor does it distinguish Perl from anything else. Nor is it particularly accurate since it's a backronym.

I agree with the flaw of not mentioning CPAN.

But I'll also disagree about the diversions. Golf and JAPHs are cute info for advanced Perl people who have spare time, but don't belong in any core discussion of the language either. They're even more useless than the backronym expansion.

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker

Comment on Re: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl? by zer (Deacon) on Oct 03, 2007 at 13:25 UTC
thats an interesting point i was refering to exactly that with the definition. As even in the perldocs that is what it says.	[reply]
Re^3: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl? by runrig (Abbot) on Oct 06, 2007 at 20:11 UTC
It also says that it really stands for "Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister", so don't always believe what you read :-)	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://642378]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (3)

As of 2024-04-25 19:51 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found