in reply to Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?
I don't think programmers are getting too lazy because of perl, but the
world is getting more complex. If you want to turn people towards perl,
just show them something that uses LWP, and then how to do the same in
C - if you can!!
It's also worth stating that everything C can do, perl can do also, even bit twiddling functions, which is surprising. The only thing that goes against perl is that it's not native, and requires a runtime.
That said, no one has ever said to me "Hey! Come and look at what I've just done in .net!!" - there are tones of people out there showing off 10-lines of perl - if you want to turn people, just show em something that fits on a single screen 80x25.
It's also worth stating that everything C can do, perl can do also, even bit twiddling functions, which is surprising. The only thing that goes against perl is that it's not native, and requires a runtime.
That said, no one has ever said to me "Hey! Come and look at what I've just done in .net!!" - there are tones of people out there showing off 10-lines of perl - if you want to turn people, just show em something that fits on a single screen 80x25.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?
by bradenshep (Beadle) on Oct 03, 2007 at 14:40 UTC | |
| |
Re^2: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?
by rdfield (Priest) on Oct 03, 2007 at 15:13 UTC | |
| |
Re^2: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?
by zer (Deacon) on Oct 03, 2007 at 13:28 UTC | |
Re^2: Are programmers getting too lazy for perl?
by flexo (Sexton) on Dec 11, 2007 at 18:07 UTC | |
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |
In Section
Meditations