Re^5: History now influences voting (wrath)

by Anonymous Monk

on Nov 21, 2007 at 15:54 UTC ( #652155=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

i.e. voting based on personal feelings towards and author instead of based on the content of nodes.
A computer can't tell the difference.

Comment on Re^5: History now influences voting (wrath)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: History now influences voting (wrath) by eric256 (Parson) on Nov 22, 2007 at 15:36 UTC
That would be why humans have to create the rules to identify that behavior. Are the rules ever going to be perfect? Almost definitly not. However I do find it amusing that at least one person used an anon account in order to avoid this very behavior while arguing that the behavior should be allowed. ___________ Eric Hodges	[reply]
Re^7: History now influences voting (wrath) by Anonymous Monk on Nov 22, 2007 at 16:09 UTC
anon cannot vote silly	[reply]
Re^8: History now influences voting (wrath) by planetscape (Chancellor) on Nov 23, 2007 at 07:32 UTC
Anonymous Monk cannot vote, true; neither can Anonymous Monk be 'harmed' by downvotes cast against him. That is what eric256 was referring to. HTH, planetscape	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://652155]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others meditating upon the Monastery: (4)

As of 2023-10-03 06:36 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found

Notices^?