Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: why won't the hash go away?

by WoodyWeaver (Monk)
on Jan 14, 2008 at 22:21 UTC ( [id://662387]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: why won't the hash go away?
in thread why won't the hash go away?

I haven't seen the problem you describe, oddly enough. That might be OS / version specific. My routines in the past would exit because of time or state limits exceeded (I'd have them start over after four hours or four billion states examined) or signals (I'd have them print and die if I sent them an INT or HUP). They would exit quickly and normally on the latter (some flavor of linux and ActiveState, 5.8.something.)

I did take the excellent advice presented here. My code now "uses memory management via fork".

while(1) { if (my $pid = fork) { open F, ">>run.log" or die "Can't open log file: $!"; print F scalar(localtime(time)), " Launched process to play cards. +\n"; my ($user,$system,$cuser,$csystem) = times; print F "user $user system $system children $cuser, $csystem\n"; close F; waitpid($pid, 0); open F, ">>run.log" or die "Can't open log file: $!"; print F scalar(localtime(time)), " Child process finished.\n"; my ($user,$system,$cuser,$csystem) = times; print F "user $user system $system children $cuser, $csystem\n"; close F; } else { die "Cannot fork: $!" unless defined $pid; initialize(); while ($current < $MAXMETRIC) { goodbye('INT') if -e $DIEFILE; ## etc } ## end while ($current < $MAXMETRIC) } }
A run shows the following:
Mon Jan 14 12:36:28 2008 Launched process to play cards. user 0.031 system 0.031 children 0, 0 Mon Jan 14 16:29:34 2008 Child process finished. user 9774.546 system 556.765 children 0, 0 Mon Jan 14 16:29:35 2008 Launched process to play cards. user 9774.546 system 556.781 children 0, 0
The "Child process finished" is after the waitpid, so that should mean that my kid is dead. There is a caveat on times() that says "times for children are included only after they terminate" which should have occurred. Why didn't I see any value on the line for 16:29:34 (and similarly for 16:29:35). Is this some sort of race condition? Or is my OS (oh, look at the Vista out this window!) so brain dead that the feature isn't implemented?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: why won't the hash go away?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 14, 2008 at 22:31 UTC
      Thanks, BrowserUK, cool article.

      I did have ProcessExplorer running, and saw that it was a new thread and not a new process instance. So it sounds like third and fourth arguments of times() are going to stay zero. Looking at memory utilization, I can see that the system is starting to get a bit pokey, but the good news is that the working set is only about two thirds of the peak working set, so it seems my objective was successful. So its not "memory management by forking" but "memory management by plucking threads". A richer image, I think.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://662387]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-23 12:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found