Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.

by stiller (Friar)
on Feb 28, 2008 at 07:43 UTC ( [id://670841]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.
in thread Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.

I'd love to see you elaborate on alternative techniques. Testing is often seen as a chore, and in the shop I work in, the problem is a blatant lack of testing (especially automated). More productive testing strategies might help push testing among peers, and that would be a good thing.

Better ideas for more productive testing are always welcome to me, but I'm not sufficiently trained or smart enough to derive more productive testing strategies from what you've written so far. I do use Smart::Comments, which I think you've mentioned, a little, but probably not as effective as I could. Also, there must be more to your techniques than using that?

  • Comment on Re^3: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://670841]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 19:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found